The chart shows the results of surveys in one African country asking teenagers the main reasons for using their phones between 2016 and 2019.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given pie charts illustrate the findings of surveys in an African nation asking teenage people the primary reasons for using their mobile phones from 2016 to 2019.
Overall, the proportions of social networking sites and digital camera increased, while the other two categories decreased. It is also noticeable that the social media occupied the most percentage of all the 4 categories.
Regarding the two upward groups, the social networks and digital camera, the former constituted half of the total proportion in 2016 and fell slightly during the second year. Then it rose to over 50% in 2018 and 2019, becoming the category with the largest percentage. The latter witnessed a similar pattern, beginning with precisely 15% in 2016 and remained unchanged in 2017. This proportion rose by 3% and 5% respectively in the 2 final years.
Concerning the two downward groups, the electronic mails and phone calls, the former took up one fourth of the total proportion in 2016 and then went down over time. The latter covered one tenth of the entire proportion in the first year and grew to 13% in 2017. However, it decreased to 11% and 5% during the last two years, making it the category with the smallest proportion.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-25 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 84 | view |
| 2022-06-17 | Duong Chelsea 49 | 78 | view |
- The diagram below shows the process by which bricks are manufactured for the building industry Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The illustrations show how chocolate is produced Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Some people think that government funding should not be spent for supporting art and culture others think supporting cultural activities may be beneficial for the population and the culture Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of the salmon Summarize the information by selecting and reportinsg the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Topic People continue to recommit crimes even after being penalized for their wrongdoings Why do you think this happens How can crime be stopped 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, regarding, second, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1019.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97073170732 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60116662611 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609756097561 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4418350266 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.9 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144301432027 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0507295358324 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0879782453741 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10435693688 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120619280781 0.0819641961636 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, regarding, second, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1019.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97073170732 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60116662611 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609756097561 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4418350266 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.9 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144301432027 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0507295358324 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0879782453741 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10435693688 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120619280781 0.0819641961636 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.