The chart shows the sales of five different kinds of jam from 2009 to 2014
The line chart indicates the sales of five different kinds of jam from 2009 to 2014.
Overall, it can be seen that all types of jam experienced an upward trend in sales except for plum during the given years. In addition, strawberry remained the most popular kind with the highest figure in most of the period.
Starting at 3.2 million units in 2009, the sales of strawberry quickly increased and reached a peak of 7 million at the end of the period. Similarly, the figures for raspberry and grape witnessed the same pattern in which their sales grew considerably and stood at 5.5 million and 4.5 million respectively in 2014.
Moving on, 2.5 million units of plum was sold in 2009. However, this number gradually dropped throughout the period and finally, no unit was recorded in 2014. Regarding cherry, its sales saw a fluctuation around 2 million in the first four years. Then, the figure increased slightly before dropping to 2.5 million in 2014
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-06 | gur1040894 | 84 | view |
| 2021-06-06 | gur1040894 | 88 | view |
| 2021-08-11 | nirajp989 | 73 | view |
- Writing Task 1 The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 11
- In some countries young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university studies Discuss the advantages and disadvantages for young people who decide to do this 56
- The chart shows the sales of five different kinds of jam from 2009 to 2014 82
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean Island between 2010 and 2017
- The chart indicates percentage of UK adults to have used the internet in different years and now
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, regarding, similarly, so, then, except for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 795.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84756097561 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50445023302 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628048780488 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 224.1 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.3504092739 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.3333333333 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2222222222 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 5.23603664747 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298270425703 0.215688989381 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139432885414 0.103423049105 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.217980823394 0.0843802449381 258% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.261225242226 0.15604864568 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.285021998352 0.0819641961636 348% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.