The given line chart depicts the information about the exchanges of various things of jam between 2009 and 2014.
looking at overall, it shows the highest data onto strawberry and in contrary side the plum by far the lowest figure at given of period.
commencing with the number of sales in Grape and Cherry was near about 1 million and close to 2, million respectively in 2009. However, look at seeing the number of cherry green slightly till 2010. Similarly, a surprising fluctuation was seen in the cherry from 2010 to 2014. On another side, in grape of things increased dramatically in the period. while, the number of plum in began of time highest compare to others thing, which accounted at the above of 3 million.
furthermore, there had been a dramatic rose observed in the rate of strawberry. Nonetheless, the figure of touch peak point until last year in 2014. The number of in raspberry and plum showed at similar data, which is above to 3 million. But the shown in no marked difference in raspberry from 2010 to 2014. In addition, there is considerably in the rate of plum it accounted for 0 million in the last year.
- Some people think that paying taxes is enough to contribute to the society other argue that being citizen involves more responsibilities Discuss what is your opinion 78
- Most high level jobs are done by men Should governments encourage that a certain percentage of these jobs be reserved for women What is your opinion 55
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negative development 73
- The chart below show the percentage of whole world population in four countries from 1950 to 2000 will projection till 2050
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make Has this been a positive or negative development 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Looking
...things of jam between 2009 and 2014. looking at overall, it shows the highest data o...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Commencing
...he lowest figure at given of period. commencing with the number of sales in Grape and C...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 98, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...as near about 1 million and close to 2, million respectively in 2009. However, look at ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 209, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rry green slightly till 2010. Similarly, a surprising fluctuation was seen in the...
^^
Line 5, column 352, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...s increased dramatically in the period. while, the number of plum in began of time hi...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Furthermore
...accounted at the above of 3 million. furthermore, there had been a dramatic rose observe...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, look, nonetheless, similarly, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 939.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.695 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61376643945 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.3380947523 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 78.25 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6666666667 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58333333333 5.23603664747 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182898954665 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0644164001962 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0749020677412 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113585915635 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0656109196275 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.2329268293 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.68 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.