The given circular chart depicts the information about the world spending and community. The data has been celebrated in percentage.
Looking in overall, it is evident that the world spending money on other and the population in Asia higher, on the contrary side the on cloth and in Africa by far the lowest figure in given time of period.
To commence with, the ratio of public expenditure on food and transport are 24% and 68%, corresponding. While the percentage of the nation that spends money on cloth is 6%, meanwhile in housing has double of it. Similarly, the globe enormous expense on other than another source.
Furthermore, in the world population percentage of Europe and America, is similar which is collected at 14%. However, the ratio of the global civilization in Africa are 10%, whereas the other has more than half. In addition to, the proportion of the world population in Asia grown dramatically .
- The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in 4 countries in 1950 and 2003 and projections for 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Young people these days tend to be less polite and respectful than in the past Causes and solutions 89
- Some people think that paying taxes is enough to contribute to the society other argue that being citizen involves more responsibilities Discuss what is your opinion 78
- Some people claim that there are more disadvantages of the car than its advantages Do you agree or disagree Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of having a car 61
- the line graph below shows the oil production and consumption in china between 1982 and 2006 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 294, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ld population in Asia grown dramatically .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, look, similarly, so, whereas, while, in addition, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 772.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01298701299 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78422791417 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577922077922 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.055518861 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.7777777778 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1111111111 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 5.23603664747 185% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155912900785 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0605025563176 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0795476100393 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0980712549068 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0671573214097 0.0819641961636 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.