This chart shows the top eight honeymoon destinations for newlywed British couples in 2010 The results come from a survey of 5 000 couples

The given bar chart highlights data about the results come from a survey among 5000 newly-married British couples who went to the top eight honeymoon destinations in 2010.

Overall, it can be seen in this graph that Thailand and Bali were the most visited by newlywed British couples of all places. Another interesting point is that it had lowest level of visitors in Spain and The Lake District.

Looking at the details, the most popular places which Thailand and Bali indicated 1 410 and about 1 300 newlywed British couples. But Spain and The Lake District were less chosen by visitors experienced between 150 and 120. The level of Costa Rica had the half of the Thailand's level. Visitors number which chosen The Maldives were next to number of British couples in Costa Rica. Paris and The Greek Islands were chosen by more newlywed couples than Spain and The Lake District. The overall figures show that the changes between different countries are quite noticeable.

Votes
Average: 9.1 (3 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 164, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'had the lowest'.
Suggestion: had the lowest
...s. Another interesting point is that it had lowest level of visitors in Spain and The Lake...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 812.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9512195122 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41241583246 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59756097561 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.605221428 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.2222222222 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2222222222 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.44444444444 5.23603664747 28% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296046918423 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102672840564 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133894358922 0.0843802449381 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229150870462 0.15604864568 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.155436779817 0.0819641961636 190% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.