The given bar chart highlights information about how many men and women research students who studying six various science-related subjects at the UK university in 2009.
Overall, it can be seen in this graph that male students who studied six science-related subjects that Physics, Astronomy, Geology, Biology, Medicine and Veterinary medicine had almost the same level, but the level of men research students studying Physics and Biology subjects showed higher than others. Another interesting point is that women students who studied Physics, Astronomy and Geology had the lowest level, however, Biology, Medicine and Veterinary medicine subjects it had the highest level.
Looking at the details, the highest level of male students who studied Physics and Biology subjects indicated between 200 and 250 students. And others' levels were approximately the same that showed 100-150 students. Female research students' levels experienced about 40-90 who studied Physics, Astronomy and Geology subjects at the UK university in 2009 while it had increasingly high level of women students studying Biology. And other two subjects which was Medicine and Veterinary medicine's level of women students who studied at the UK university in 2009.
- Convenience foods will become increasingly prevalent and eventually replace traditional foods and traditional methods of food preparation To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 61
- This chart shows the top eight honeymoon destinations for newlywed British couples in 2010 The results come from a survey of 5 000 couples 91
- The graph below shows the number of visitors to three museums between 2000 and 2005 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- In many countries students attend private cram schools for extra coaching in test taking techniques What is your view of this practice 78
- The graph below shows the number of visitors to three museums between 2000 and 2005 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, look, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.15609756098 349% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 15.0 33.7804878049 44% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1055.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64171122995 4.92477711251 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76815329289 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.475935828877 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 318.6 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.1389056588 43.030603864 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.714285714 112.824112599 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7142857143 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57142857143 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293366810063 0.215688989381 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.172374487411 0.103423049105 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101704029315 0.0843802449381 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.254281786679 0.15604864568 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0799724198944 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 13.2329268293 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 61.2550243902 60% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 11.4140731707 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.4329268293 175% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.