The chart shows the unemployment situation in Australia in the year 2012.
The given line graph provides the comparison of the volume of the unemployment situation in Australia during 4 period in 2012.
From an overall perspective, it is obvious that the number of umemployed people in city and countryside experienced a fluctuated trend over the quarters shown. Moreover, the statistic of people who don't have job live in rural areas was much more higher in the beginning whereas nearly met at the same records at the end of year.
According to the data from the first and second quarters, it is concpicuous that the unemployment located in suburb areas reached peak in January, with the recorded number was 7% and roughly more than 3 times when compared with the others. Next, there was a downward trend occured in the number of jobless people while the figure of these people in city witnessed an upward trend from the first to the second quarter. The unemployment in rural areas plummeted to 4.5% in the second quarter and this number in city made a twofold jump since the first quarters.
Moving onto the remaining quarters, there was an increase in the number of jobless people at the third quarters, with the number is 5.5%. However, the volume of this group in city is declined by exactly 2% at the same time. Finally. at the end of the year 2012, the percentage of unemployed in both rural and coutryside had the same pattern, which was around 5%. It is clear that both of this group saw an dramatical volatile in 2012.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-10 | Trần Ánh Vy | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-19 | hahoaan | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Huyenlbg87 | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
- Plan A below shows a health centre in 2005 Plan B shows the same place in the present day 73
- The diagrams below show how houses can be protected in areas which are prone to flooding 73
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country while some people think it is bad Discuss both views and state your opinion 56
- The diagram gives information about the process of making carbonated drinks 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 199, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
.... Moreover, the statistic of people who dont have job live in rural areas was much m...
^^^^
Line 3, column 209, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'jobbed'.
Suggestion: jobbed
..., the statistic of people who dont have job live in rural areas was much more highe...
^^^
Line 3, column 242, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'higher' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: higher
...t have job live in rural areas was much more higher in the beginning whereas nearly met at ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 225, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...eclined by exactly 2% at the same time. Finally. at the end of the year 2012, the perce...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 234, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: At
...y exactly 2% at the same time. Finally. at the end of the year 2012, the percentag...
^^
Line 7, column 404, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...It is clear that both of this group saw an dramatical volatile in 2012.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, moreover, second, so, third, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1207.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 256.0 196.424390244 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71484375 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52702374326 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5078125 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 364.5 283.868780488 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.083921746 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.7 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 5.23603664747 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135874343578 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0658436088099 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0890419127049 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114439942539 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10245233327 0.0819641961636 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.