Some employers reward members of staff for their exceptional contribution to the company by giving them extra money. This practice can act as an incentive for some but may also have a negative impact on others. To what extent is this style of management effective? Are there better ways of encouraging employees to work hard?
There has been a colossal upsurge in prodigies discussing the topic of the way that managers should reward their employees. In the midst of the materialistic age, the extra money can be seen as the most ubiquitous award for managers due to their active contribution to the business whereas this method still has some setbacks. In this essay, I will cite whether this trend tends to be in the negative or positive direction and give other alternative solutions which might motivate the worker to be studious.
In the consumeristic era, money plays fundamental importance in all transactions and raising the living standard. That’s why gratuity could support employees to purchase for the underlying factor in their life and play a stimulating role to force them to work effectively. As the saying goes “Money makes the mare goes”, so it can be stated that these bonuses can make the worker feel deserved for their relentless effort in their career. It is evident that having a bunch of money can help the worker have more chances to satisfy their need in life. Moreover, this reward can make them don’t become a slave-drive for their entrepreneurs. Nevertheless, this gratuity can create a competitive working environment. Because of the limited number of this award, employees who don’t gain it might feel envy and jealousy of others. This phenomenon sometimes pressurized the employee, which dishearten their working morale and productivity. For instance, in some industrialized nations, some records report the overtime working of employees in order to reach the target can make them feel more stressed and unhappy with their career, which can affect adversely their mental and physical health.
Considering the other solutions, the manager can motivate their employees by caring about their emotions and organizing some programs to spur them productivity. Instead of rewarding money, manager can alter it by setting up an event to celebrate the goal that company has achieved. Working environment may become more friendly and this method can keep the cohesiveness among workers. Company can provide free lunch and snacks for their employee in order to ensure they don’t skip the meals to work round the clock. Extending the break time might invigorate the morale of workers. Finally, managers should treat all workers equivalently to guarantee that they all satisfy and comfort with their work.
In conclusion, it is all stated that remuneration can spur the incentive of employees to work efficiently and effectively whereas there still have some drawbacks. Personally, I believe that not only gratuity can accelerate the motivation of employees but also internal needs of them should be satisfied. Combing the award by extra money and psychological incentive can lead the enterprise to the optimal result.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ht motivate the worker to be studious. In the consumeristic era, money plays fund...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, whereas, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 25.0 7.85571142285 318% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 24.0651302605 187% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2380.0 1615.20841683 147% => OK
No of words: 450.0 315.596192385 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28888888889 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6057793516 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82764134139 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 176.041082164 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526666666667 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 729.0 506.74238477 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3129727154 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.333333333 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4285714286 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7619047619 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 8.67935871743 219% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.357323765335 0.244688304435 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10673278578 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590819535197 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226182655275 0.151304729494 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.041200478096 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 78.4519038076 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ht motivate the worker to be studious. In the consumeristic era, money plays fund...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, whereas, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 25.0 7.85571142285 318% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 24.0651302605 187% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2380.0 1615.20841683 147% => OK
No of words: 450.0 315.596192385 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28888888889 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6057793516 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82764134139 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 176.041082164 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526666666667 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 729.0 506.74238477 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3129727154 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.333333333 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4285714286 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7619047619 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 8.67935871743 219% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.357323765335 0.244688304435 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10673278578 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590819535197 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226182655275 0.151304729494 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.041200478096 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 78.4519038076 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.