The chart below shows the number of trips made by children in one country in 1990 and 2010 to travel to and from school using different modes of transport.
The given bar chart provides a comparison of the number of trips organized by children in one nation in 1990 and 2010 to commute to various destinations by five models of transport.
From an overall perspective, one particularly interesting fact highlighted that most of the types of transport witnessed a decline over a 20-year period whereas the reversed pattern should be observed for the quantity of students use car passenger over the years shown.
Taking a first look at the top three models most used in 1990, it is obvious that walking accounted for more than 12 million users at the beginning, which was higher than nearly 2 times when compared with cycling and bus. However, the number of children walking to the destination decreased more than double after 20 years. Following that, children who arrive at their destination by cycling were down as 3 times as the initial number. Although the dramatic decrease in the walking and cycling model, the number of pupils using the bus system slightly decreased by 2 million people in 2010.
Moving to the two remaining groups, it is noticeable that the children experiencing in-car passenger to access their destination had experienced an upward trend, which increased from more than 4 million in 1990 to nearly 12 million in 2010. Finally, the number of users utilizing walking and bus mode was roughly less than 2 times when compared with the previous numbers.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, look, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1186.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 237.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00421940928 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67098272734 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57805907173 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 346.5 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.3575991196 43.030603864 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.25 112.824112599 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.625 22.9334400587 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215521875066 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0991367163865 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696530078451 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14601445039 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0771810044379 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.