The charts and the pie show the number of students at university in a particular European country, the government's annual spending on each student between 1984 and 2009, and the percentages of students' economic family background.

The bar chart shows the student number at university over a twenty-five-year period since 1984 in a certain European country. An overwhelming increase can be seen in the first five years, rising from 159,000 to 259,000 before falling to 200,000 in 1994. After that, there was a staggering soar in 1999 with 338,000. Then, the population increased stably from 375,000 to 400,000 in 2009.

The line graph illustrated the government's spending on per student while in 1984, most amout was invested with 14,440. After a dramatic decline in 1989 with 12,500, a slight rise can be seen at 12,700 and then a continuous ten-year-decrease caused only 11,300 was paid in 2004 before increasing moderately to 11,600 in 2009.

The pie chart demonstrated the proportion of income background. The most principal percentage was in high income families, accounting for 52%, compared with low and middle income families, occupying 26% and 22%, respectively.

Overall, this period witnessed a nearly tripled increase in the university student population, while the government reduced one third payment for each student, based on a economic background that high income families took up more than half.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 170, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...hird payment for each student, based on a economic background that high income fa...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, so, then, third, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1003.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33510638298 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95458973429 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.675531914894 0.547539520022 123% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.3614165749 43.030603864 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.444444444 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8888888889 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22222222222 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245047079996 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100565084879 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108029740656 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133881659627 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0610880990821 0.0819641961636 75% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.