The charts below give information about the people use the public library and the main reasons to visit in Britain in 1991 and 2000.
The bar charts compare the main purposes of British people coming to the public library between 1991 and 2000.
Overall, a majority of British in both 1991 and 2000, 65% and 55% respectively, went to a government-funded library in order to borrow or return a book.
In 1991, there was 10% of British citizens obtained information from the public library, whereas the percentage of people getting information from the library was two times higher in 2000 than in 1991. Instead, there were as twice as many people spending their time reading newspaper or magazine in public library in 2000 as in 1991.
The proportion of British citizens studying in government-funded library decreased dramatically, from 10% to 2%, over a period from 1991 to 2000. This trend might be because of a sharp rise in the percentage of people borrowing and returning videos at the library. Specifically, in 2000, there were as many as 18% of British people reaching to the public library for videos borrowing and returning purposes, compared to 0% in 1991.
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 73
- The diagram below shows how the Australian Bureau of Meteorology collects up-to-the-minute information on the weather in order to produce reliable forecasts. 56
- The charts below give information about the people use public library and the main reasons to visit in Britain in 1991 in 2000 86
- The diagram below shows how the Australian Bureau of Meteorology collects up to the minute information on the weather in order to produce reliable forecasts 51
- Give up to three practical examples of how you intend to use the knowledge skills and connections you will gain from your scholarship Possible tasks can be personal and or professional and b list any possible constraints you think may prevent you from ach 74
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 976.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95431472081 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84557498912 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.482233502538 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.2531534873 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.625 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.875 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.518751241284 0.215688989381 241% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.274804884589 0.103423049105 266% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.287384611208 0.0843802449381 341% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.378234431987 0.15604864568 242% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.321252982399 0.0819641961636 392% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.