The charts illustrate the information regarding the ratio of the marriages and divorces of the american from 1970 to 2000, as well as depreciate the percentage of the martial status of american adults in these two years.
Overall, the rate of the marriages remains at peak as compared to divorces in the USA over the period given. While the percentage of the married american people is most significant whereas the proportion of divorced people is least significant as shown by the chart.
First of all, in 1970, the number of the married people was 2.5 millions, and remains unchanged till the next decade.Whereas the divorces rate was 1 millions, in 1970, which was increased slightly to around 1.1 millions in the year of 1980. After this year, there was a gradual decrease in the figure of the american adults who was married to exactly 2 millions in contrast with the divorce which was fell moderately to approximately 1 million at the end of the period.
Secondly, the percentage of the american people was around 70 percent in 1970 which was go down to around 60 percent. Similarly, the widowed people had slightly decreased ( from 10 percent to about 5 percent) from 1970 to 2000 respectively.
In contrast with, the amount of the adults who were never married and divorced had increased in these respective years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 118, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Whereas
... remains unchanged till the next decade.Whereas the divorces rate was 1 millions, in 19...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 351, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...erican adults who was married to exactly 2 millions in contrast with the divorce ...
^^
Line 7, column 89, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'gone'.
Suggestion: gone
...was around 70 percent in 1970 which was go down to around 60 percent. Similarly, t...
^^
Line 7, column 171, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he widowed people had slightly decreased from 10 percent to about 5 percent from ...
^^
Line 8, column 4, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...ent from 1970 to 2000 respectively. In contrast with, the amount of the adults who were...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, regarding, second, secondly, similarly, well, whereas, while, in contrast, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1107.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72670922723 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488888888889 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 327.6 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.0229902967 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.375 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.125 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.75 5.23603664747 263% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213978897625 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106373372404 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0945159324115 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140093242603 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10684966722 0.0819641961636 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.