The first chart illustrates the date of the American marriage and divorce rate, while the second chart explains the marital status of America's adults.
Overall, we can see that the marriage rate showed a decreasing trend, whereas a fluctuating trend was experienced by the divorce rate. Marital couples; additional, hit a peak in both the years.
According to the first chart, the number of weddings held in 1970 was as many as in 1980 (2.5 million each); however, it dropped by around 0.25 million in 1980 and then continued to decline to 2 million. The divorce rate in 1970 accounted for 1 million which was rosed to about 1.25 million in the next decade. just above 1 million was reported in 1990 and at i million in 2000.
In the next graph, 70% of adults married in 1970 and 60% in 2000; however, almost 15% in 1970 and and 20 % in 2000 was single. just below 10% was recorded widowed in 1970 as opposed to 2000 when only 8% was registered. a minor percentage was constituted nearly 2% got divorced in 1970, as compared to 2000when the number increased to around 9%.
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the seaside resort of Templeton between 1990 and 2005 78
- The charts below give information about USA marriage and divorce rates between 1970 and 2000 and the marital status of adult Americans in two of the years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where re 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 78, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... rate showed a decreasing trend, whereas a fluctuating trend was experienced by t...
^^
Line 5, column 107, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...was as many as in 1980 2.5 million each; however, it dropped by around 0.25 milli...
^^
Line 5, column 311, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Just
... about 1.25 million in the next decade. just above 1 million was reported in 1990 an...
^^^^
Line 5, column 362, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...1 million was reported in 1990 and at i million in 2000. In the next graph, 70% of a...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 95, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: and
...0% in 2000; however, almost 15% in 1970 and and 20 % in 2000 was single. just below 10%...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 128, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Just
...n 1970 and and 20 % in 2000 was single. just below 10% was recorded widowed in 1970 ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 220, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: A
...ed to 2000 when only 8% was registered. a minor percentage was constituted nearly...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, second, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 890.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63541666667 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48737044524 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59375 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5739709642 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8888888889 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198462393803 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0882336944334 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532905176971 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130897188554 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0525611122378 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.