The charts below give information about the way in which water was used in differnt countries in 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisos where relevant

The graphs below bring data about the purpose of using water in different countries in 2000. We can see that water is very important in many countries and people depend on it lo live.

Looking at the graphs, it is clearly obvious that agriculture is the main reason of using water in countries across the world. Following up are industry and domestic. These three areas are also the purposes of consuming water in the world, which account for 100%.

In chart 1, as we mention above, people use water mainly for agriculture. This activity occupies 70% of world water use in 2000. This number is really high in comparison with the numbers in industry and domestic, with the sequence is 22% in industry and 8% in domestic.

Agriculture is the main aim of using water, and the numbers in selected countries also prove that thought. In India, people even use 92% of water for agriculture, an enormous number compared to just 5% in domestic and 3% in industry. Meanwhile, in China, agriculture also leads the table with 69% of water use. A slight difference is that the number in industry is higher than domestic's number, 22% compared with 9%. In New Zealand and Canada, this trend doesn't exist anymore. Domestic is the main reason of using water in New Zealand with 2% higher than agriculture, while in Canada, industry dominates the table with 80% of water use in 2000.

Votes
Average: 4.7 (5 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 456, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
.... In New Zealand and Canada, this trend doesnt exist anymore. Domestic is the main rea...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 646, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he table with 80% of water use in 2000.
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, really, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1136.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 239.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75313807531 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4850245613 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506276150628 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 348.3 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.1417363833 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.1428571429 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0714285714 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.35714285714 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201549089196 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0852027135147 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0711522214506 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139919448072 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0286629309827 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.97 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.