The charts below give information about the way in which water was used in different countries in 2000.
The given pie chart reveals the information about the consumption of water in the world during the year 2000. The second historical chart show the way of water used in four selected countries. The data is calibrated in percentum.
It can be seen that,during the year 2000. The three different ways using the water of the world. Apart from that, agriculture had been using 70% water. Moreover, 80% of water using had domestic. However, In the year 2000 industry was using water only 22%.
As far as, trend was concerned that during the year 2000 Canada was used 8% of water agricultural and 12% water used in domestic and industry had use water 80%. Nextly, the nation of New Zealand had been use 44% water for agricultural, and 10% of water use in industry. Furthermore, India had been 92% water used in agriculture and 5% of water used in domastic and 3% water had used in industry. While, china had mostly water use 69% in agriculture and 9% of water used for domestic and 22% of water used for industry.
Overall, It is evident that the nation of India had been using lot of water for agriculture as compare to other three nations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 194, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... water used in four selected countries. The data is calibrated in percentum. It ca...
^^^
Line 2, column 20, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , during
...rated in percentum. It can be seen that,during the year 2000. The three different ways...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 420, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'watered'.
Suggestion: watered
...ed in industry. While, china had mostly water use 69% in agriculture and 9% of water ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, while, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 935.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60591133005 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49488787912 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.472906403941 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.3279339723 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.9230769231 112.824112599 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6153846154 22.9334400587 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.69230769231 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.09268292683 318% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.357230441656 0.215688989381 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.167589277315 0.103423049105 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0874122232814 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23632651982 0.15604864568 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0930079950089 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.1 13.2329268293 61% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.16 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.03 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 11.4329268293 44% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.