The assigned pie charts contrast the proportion of world expenditure on a series of requirements and the distribution of population among four main continents, namely, Asia, Africa, Americas, Europe and others.
From an overall perspective, people spend varies on different expenditures. It is obvious that considerable money was spent on other aspects on top of food, clothing, housing, transport. In the meantime, more than half of the population came from Asia, which is far higher than the population in other places.
In terms of world spending, nearly 40 percent of expenditures around the world were attributed to additional requirements. While food stood in the second important position with a figure of 24 percent, which was two percent more than house spending. Moreover, which was superior to spending on transport, the latter accounted for 18 percent of the total expending. The lowest spending was attributed to clothing, merely 6 percent.
Moving to the remaining term world population, more than half of inhabitants live in Asia, while the world population of America and Europe saw an identical percentage, all were 14 percent of the total population. Following that, Africa accounted for the minority proportion of the world population when compared with three other continents, to be species, with a figure of ten percent. In addition to that, there was still approximately 5 percent population living in other places.
- Consumption of meat The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 73
- The Maps below gives information on the Village Park ten years ago and now 84
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features make comparisons where relevant https www tes 56
- Consumption of meat The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 73
- It is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, second, still, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1221.0 965.302439024 126% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40265486726 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01132446366 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566371681416 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 373.5 283.868780488 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0248747258 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5454545455 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.72727272727 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0972104354456 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0411683738821 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0264455306211 0.0843802449381 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.066736781048 0.15604864568 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0211960491834 0.0819641961636 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 40.7170731707 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.