Nations around the world, nowadays billed contemporary styled structure to present its scenic beauty. However, many individuals claim that the new
Constructions are needed to be made as per conventional style to save cultural identification. I disagree, because of the consumption of high cost and modern buildings being more comfortable. Yet, culture can be saved via other alternatives.
At the onset, other easier and less financially burdening ways can the preservation of the culture. In other words, it becomes extremely expensive to make an establishment especially for cultural motive, therefore simpler and cheaper methods like literature, period movies, tourism and conservation of existing, Old styled buildings may support the motive. To explain, a gift from a younger age, the importance of culture is taught via other mediums, it could be easily preserved. According to a report by Delhi University, the approach to learning cultural values writer and recreational methods have helped children to a greater extent. Hence, rather than constructing buildings, other methods could be adopted.
Moreover, to construct traditionally styled living is an impractical idea for the modern era. Nowadays, modernism is promoted even when it comes to establishments is not only allows the enhancement of this seems but also keep in check the needs of the present generation.
To elaborate, modern buildings are structured in such a way that they easily improve the view. Along with this, modern problems require modern solutions.
These issues can only be solved by advanced technology and not the old cultural methods. Electricity, for example, conventional houses were not equipped with it but at present, it is impossible to live without it. Therefore, this idea is illogical.
To conclude, I think it is inappropriate to build structures of old-style; for high financial cost and comfort provided by modern style buildings. Thus, otherwise preserving the culture should be given an allowance.
- The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in 4 countries in 1950 and 2003 and projections for 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below shows the percentage of whole world population in four countries from 1950 to 2000 with projections till 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The chart below shows the percentage of whole world population in four countries from 1950 to 2000 with projections till 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The table below gives information about population of over 60 year olds in six regions in 2000 and the predicted number of population over 60 in 2050 It also shows the world population over 60 in 2000 and 2050 Summarise the information in the following th 84
- Road transport is taking over rail services Discuss the positive and negative effects of this development Is this situation true for your country 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 562, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'values'' or 'value's'?
Suggestion: values'; value's
...sity, the approach to learning cultural values writer and recreational methods have ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 568, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the approach to learning cultural values writer and recreational methods have hel...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, for example, i think, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1711.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57328990228 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13885186124 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635179153094 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.5984017362 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0555555556 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0555555556 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.72222222222 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.38176352705 160% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211173321644 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0648795359484 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0437884992159 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103694658335 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0519975348575 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.73 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.03 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.