The charts below give information on the ages of people when they got married in one particular country in 1996 and 2008.
The bar chart illustrates the percentage of males and females, in a particular nation, getting married according to six different age groups ( 16-19, 20-24, 25-29, 30-34, 35-39, 40-44) in 1996 and 2008.
Overall, it is immediately obvious that the proportion of both men and women mated under 30 old decreased slightly, while the opposite was true for those aged 30 and older. In addition, 25-29 was the most popular age range for women wedded, whereas for men it was 30 to 39.
In both years, 16-19-year-olds were the lowest rate of people espoused, with women about 1% in 1996 and at less than 0.5% in 2008. Noticeably, no men in this age group got married. The figures for those aged 20-24 also reduced half from approximately 6% to 3% and just over 2% to under 2% for men. While the number of girls wedding remained stable at around 12%, the mark of boys slightly dropped to 8% in 2008.
Looking at the next three age organizations (30 to 44), there was a mild increase to 8% and 11% in the proportion of 30-34-year-old females and males getting married, respectively. Nevertheless, In the 35-39 aged group, while the number of men whose wedding rose 4%, to 11%, the totals for women fell from 4% down above 2%. Finally, the percentage of feminine got married stayed relatively unchanged in both years. Meanwhile, the figures for men climbed up about 1% from nearly 4% to almost 6% in the oldest age group.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-16 | denistran85 | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-06 | denistran85 | 73 | view |
| 2022-06-09 | Hai Anh Phan Thi | 42 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 47 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 73 | view |
- The pie diagrams show the extent of Australian optional school graduates who were jobless, utilized or seeking after further training, in 1980, 1990 and 2000. 78
- The graph below shows the population of particular country by age group starting in 1960 and including a forecast to 2040 89
- The world of work is rapidly changing and employees cannot depend on having the same job or the same working conditions for life Why is it the case Can you suggest some ways to prepare people to work in the future 95
- The maps below compare 2 floor plans of one trade conference held in 2009 and 2010 11
- Some people think governments should spend money on faster means of public transport However others think money should be spent on other priorities eg cost environment Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 141, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed according to six different age groups 16-19, 20-24, 25-29, 30-34, 35-39, 40-44...
^^
Line 5, column 363, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s wedding remained stable at around 12%, the mark of boys slightly dropped to 8% ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, if, look, nevertheless, so, whereas, while, as for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1163.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 249.0 196.424390244 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67068273092 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6447970989 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 106.607317073 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582329317269 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 323.1 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8179841893 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.727272727 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6363636364 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.09090909091 5.23603664747 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146281814396 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0620996164128 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0450809665794 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102963856356 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.05161095537 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.