The charts below give information on the ages of people when they got married in one particular country in 1996 and 2008.
The bar charts compare the percentages of males and females, in a particular country, getting married according to six different age groups (16-19, 20-24, 25-29, 30-34, 35-39, 40-44), in 1996 and 2008.
It is clear that the proportion of both men and women getting married under the age of 30 decreased slightly, while the opposite was true for those aged 30 and older. In addition, 25-29 was the most popular age range for women to get married, while for men it was 30-34 and 35-39.
In both years, 16-19-year-olds were the lowest percentage of people getting married, with women at less than 0.5% in 1996 and about 1% in 2008. Noticeably, no men in this age group got married. The figures for those aged 20-24 also reduced over the years from approximately 6% to 3% for women and just over 2% to just under 2% for men. Meanwhile, the figure for 25-29-year-old women remained unchanged at about 12%, as opposed to a slight drop to 8% in the figure for men.
Regarding older age groups, a considerable rise to 8% and 11% respectively could be seen in the proportion of 30-34-year-old females and males getting married. However, while the number of men who got married aged 35-39 increased by 4%, to 11% in 2008, only 3% of women in that age group married in 2008. Finally, the figures for both genders in the 40-45 age group remained relatively unchanged over the examined period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-27 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 73 | view |
| 2018-09-09 | Harrykaur | 78 | view |
| 2018-09-09 | Harrykaur | 56 | view |
| 2017-04-04 | kingnight153 | 78 | view |
| 2017-04-03 | kingnight153 | 67 | view |
- Some people say that the increasing business and cultural contact between countries is a positive development while others think that many countries will lose their national identities as a result Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- The pie charts show the results of a survey conducted by a university on the opinions of full time and part time students about its services 73
- The graph below gives information about U.S. government spending on the research between 1980 and 2008 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of government spending on roads and transport in 4 countries in the years 1990, 1995, 2000, 2005. 84
- The table and graph below give information about cinema attendance in Australia between 1994 and 2002 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, however, if, regarding, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1142.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 243.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69958847737 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63743953813 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526748971193 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 318.6 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4571755476 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.2 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161992773779 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.079983776239 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0691202107494 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118977040063 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0475545339604 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.