The charts below give information on the ages of people when they got married in one particular country in 1996 and 2008.
The bar charts depicts the percentage of males and females getting married accross a range of age groups in a certain country in 1996 and 2008.
Overall, as can be seen from the given charts, whereas the proportion of people under 30 marrying seemed to decrease after 12 years, there was an upward trend in terms of those over 30. Besides, men tended to get married when they get older, while that of women was relatively smaller. Noticeably, 25 to 29 and 30 to 34 were the ideal ages for getting married in both genders.
The rate of those married women from 16 to 19 was by far smallest and decreased a half after over a decade (0.5 per cent in 2008 vs. 1 per cent in 1996). The number increased sharply with age untill reaching its peak when they were 25 to 29 at about 11,5 per cent and remained relatively unchanged after 12 years. Similarly, the proportion of those men who got married saw also a rise when they were from 20 - 24 to 25 - 29, 2,5 and 9, respectively, although no men married when they were under 20 years old. The figure dropped by 1 per cent in 2008 in comparison with that in 1996.
In contrast, once those residents were over 30, married rate decreased steadily with age. Especially, the numbers for married men tended to be considerably higher than women. After 12 years, the numbers increased by 1 per cent in terms of married men, and by 0,5 per cent for women.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-27 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 73 | view |
| 2018-09-09 | Harrykaur | 78 | view |
| 2018-09-09 | Harrykaur | 56 | view |
| 2017-04-04 | kingnight153 | 78 | view |
| 2017-04-03 | kingnight153 | 67 | view |
- The graph below shows the changes in UK birth rate of women in 6 different ages from 1973 to 2008. 78
- In many parts of the world children and teenagers are committing more crimes Why is this happening How should they by punished 39
- The diagram shows the information in the genetic engineering process. 56
- the three maps shows changes in the village of Kelsbey from 1780 to 2000 89
- Thecharts below give information on the ages of people when they gotmarried in oneparticularcountry in1996 and2008. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 16, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[2]
Message: You should probably use 'depict'.
Suggestion: depict
The bar charts depicts the percentage of males and females get...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, similarly, so, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1138.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 257.0 196.424390244 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.4280155642 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38133497222 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 106.607317073 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529182879377 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 324.0 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.023359478 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.8333333333 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4166666667 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230692202184 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0942816216998 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0557870404735 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158350103851 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0639286826132 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.41 11.4140731707 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.26 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.