The charts below give information on the ages of the population of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.
The data given in the pie charts depict the proportions of three age groups in Yemen and Italy in the year 2000 and predictions for 2050.
As can be seen that the figures for citizens aged from 15 to 59 in Yemen increase slightly, whereas this number in Italy drop dramatically between 2000 and 1950. On the contrary, the percentages of the oldest group go up and the youngest’ ones go down moderately in both countries.
In 2000, the proportion of 0-14 age profile took up just over a half in Yemen, while Italy’s one had only 14.3%. Similarly, the figure for 15-59 year-old in Yemen occupied just over 46% in 2000, and this figure is expected to make up approximately 57% in 2050. By the contrast, it is predicted that the number of people aged 60 or more is likely to grow sharply, from 3.6% to 5.7%.
Besides, there is an expectation that the proportion of the oldest group will experience a significant growth by approximately a half, from 24% in 2000 to 42% in 2050. On the contrary, the youngest range made up 14.3% in 2000 and is estimated to reduce moderately by 2.8% in 2050.
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008. 56
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in cement-making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes. 56
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010. 61
- The range of technology available to people is increasing the gap between the rich and the poor. Others think it has an opposite effect. Discuss both views and give opinions. 56
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these cause affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, similarly, whereas, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 909.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59090909091 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7463650834 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565656565657 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 19.5060086896 43.030603864 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 113.625 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282364784685 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129582901653 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0978767488691 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198267216186 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.088506263313 0.0819641961636 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.