The charts below give Information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy In 2000 and projections for 2050.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
There are two pie charts which show the occupation of different age group in Yemen and Italy in 2000 and two other pie charts give prediction on same figure for the year 2050. It shows Italy will enter the aging society in 2050, while Yemen will full of people whose age under 60.
In 2000, around half of people were age under 14 in Yemen, and 46.3% of people aged between 15 and 59. Lower than 4% of whole population were elder people. After five decades, the prediction shows the percentage of people who higher than 60 grows little, which reach 5.7%. And the main parts of age groups in Yemen are still young children and middle age group which occupy 37% and 57.3% respectively.
On the contrary, Italy had many middle age people which occupied over 60% in all in 2000. But on the same time, around one quarter of people aged over 60 and less than 15% of population were occupied by teenagers. And with time goes by, the percentage of elder people grows higher and reach 42.3% in 2050 in prediction. And the middle age group and teenagers occupy 46.2% and 11.5% of population respectively.
To summarize, Yemen will have more number of younger people in 2050 while Italy have to enter in the aging society at the same time.
- The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast foods in Britain The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast foods Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 78
- Should old buildings be destroyed and replaced with modern ones 89
- In many cities young people prefer shopping as a form of leisure activity, why do you think this happens and is positive or negative development? 56
- The chart below shows the amount spent on six consumer goods in four European countries.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 73
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in the year 1999. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 403, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hich occupy 37% and 57.3% respectively. On the contrary, Italy had many middle a...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, still, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1021.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57847533632 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.17996264308 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511210762332 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.5523068977 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.8181818182 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2727272727 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.81818181818 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200235287232 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0861421461712 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054125955158 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138312407065 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0535550847028 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.33 8.06136585366 79% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.