The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections in 2050

Essay topics:

The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections in 2050.

The given list of charts compares and predicts the proportional change in the population of Italy and Yemen over a period of 50 years from 2000 to 2050.

Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that besides having a majority of adults, Italy is predicted to witness a significant rise in the proportion of aged people. However, with the opposite trend, Yemen will observe a sharp rise in the number of adults and children.

According to the given illustration, in 2000 in Yemen, over half of the population constituted young children, and more than 2 in every 5 people reported as adults(15-59 years). However, just 3.6% of the total population fell into the category of old people. In contrast, whilst nearly 3 out of 5 people in Italy belonged to age-group 15-59, just below a quarter recorded as aged and merely 14.3% were children.

Turning to predictions, after 5 decades, Yemen and Italy are expected to continue with a reverse trend in the context of adults and aged proportion. As with a slight uptick of 10%, the former will experience an upward trend in the adult's number, while the latter is expected to plummet sharply by 15%. Also, Italy will notice a dramatic spike in the aged population, up by nearly 2 times as against a 2% rise in Yemen. However, the percentage of children is predicted to be low by 13% and 3% respectively in Yemen and Italy by the end of the period.

Votes
Average: 8.7 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-09-21 pris 73 view
2020-09-21 pris 73 view

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, however, if, look, so, while, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1176.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 247.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76113360324 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.733606117 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542510121457 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 365.4 283.868780488 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.6367426467 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.6 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292144847614 0.215688989381 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110060054362 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0739498750765 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180971393246 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0713033214826 0.0819641961636 87% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.