The provided list of charts compares the change in the proportional rate of the population of Italy and Yemen with respect to three age-groups in 2000 and predictions for the same over a period of the next 50 years.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that Yemen had a higher percentage of the young generation and is predicted to continue with a similar pattern with a very few altercations. In contrast, the population in Italy was more matured and is expected to get aged at a dramatic rate.
According to the given illustration, in 2000, over half of the population in Yemen was children below 14 years of age, compared to just 14.3% in Italy. Nearly 3 in every 5 people were adults in the age-group(15 to 59 years) in Yemen, which was higher in Italy by 15%. However, about a quarter of the population in Italy was recorded as over 60 as against just 3.6% in Yemen.
As per the predictions, the population of Italy is expected to be older by 2050, 42.3% according to future analysis. However, a 15% and 3% decline in the number of adults and children is predicted by the end of the period. On the contrary, with only a 2% rise in the old population, Yemen is envisaged to have a surge in the population of adults by about 10% followed by a slight dip of 13% in children.
- A person s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions Old fashioned values such as honor kindness and trust no longer seem important To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 92
- The diagrams below are existing and proposed floor plans for the redevelopment of an art gallery 84
- Some people think governments should care more about the elderly while others think they should focus on investing in education for younger people Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- The table compares international tourism in 2009 and 2010 in 9 countries 62
- The table below gives information about the employment sectors in which people from three age groups worked 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, look, in contrast, on the contrary, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 33.7804878049 172% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1075.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 238.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.51680672269 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76601141559 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529411764706 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 341.1 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4092349598 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.444444444 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4444444444 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31431074323 0.215688989381 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126455344559 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724853155819 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183600092758 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0609530816129 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.