The provided list of charts compares the change in the proportional rate of the population of Italy and Yemen with respect to three age-groups in 2000 and predictions for the same over a period of the next 50 years.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that Yemen had a higher percentage of the young generation and is predicted to continue with a similar pattern with a very few altercations. In contrast, the population in Italy was more matured and is expected to get aged at a dramatic rate.
According to the given illustration, in 2000, over half of the population in Yemen was children below 14 years of age, compared to just 14.3% in Italy. Nearly 3 in every 5 people were adults in the age-group(15 to 59 years) in Yemen, which was higher in Italy by 15%. However, about a quarter of the population in Italy was recorded as over 60 as against just 3.6% in Yemen.
As per the predictions, the population of Italy is expected to be older by 2050, 42.3% according to future analysis. However, a 15% and 3% decline in the number of adults and children is predicted by the end of the period. On the contrary, with only a 2% rise in the old population, Yemen is envisaged to have a surge in the population of adults by about 10% followed by a slight dip of 13% in children.
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel s customer service The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010 89
- The table below shows the amount of waste production in millions of tonnes in six different countries over a twenty year period 47
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of a salmon from egg to adult fish 84
- The diagram below shows the water cycle which is the continuous movement of water on above and below the surface of the Earth 78
- Long term international migration emigration and net migration from 1999 to 2008 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, look, in contrast, on the contrary, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 33.7804878049 172% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1075.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 238.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.51680672269 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76601141559 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529411764706 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 341.1 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4092349598 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.444444444 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4444444444 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31431074323 0.215688989381 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126455344559 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724853155819 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183600092758 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0609530816129 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.