The charts below shoe the percentage of government spending and of participants between 18 and 24 years old for education and training in 2010

Essay topics:

The charts below shoe the percentage of government spending and of participants between 18 and 24 years old for education and training in 2010.

The given table clearly depicts the figure of five European government spending on education and training and also the participation of their countries’ 18-24 year-old-people in education in 2010.

Regarding to the contribution of government, we can obviously see that the percentage of money spending in Sweden was 25%, lead to the highest score. The second largest number was 13%, which was represented by Hungarey, followed by UK and Czech republic with the figure of 10% and 9%, respectively. By contrast, Poland authority just spends very little expenditure on this field as the rate was just one fifth as much as that in Sweden.

According to the joining by individuals aging from 18 to 24, interestingly, though Poland government provide the relatively limited fund in education and training, the young people in this country seemed to have the great participation reached up up to 44%, ranking the top among 5 countries, this figure was very close to their Sweden counterpart (40%) and 10% higher than that in Hungarey. Noticeably, the proportion relating to Czech republic and UK continued to constitute the lowest numbers in this issue with 23% and 27%, respectively.

Overall, when it comes to national budget distribution in education, there was a huge gap among listed countries; however, in terms of participation in this field, although the distance was still large but it was smaller than that of mentioned authorities’ money provision

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-07-02 phuchannn 84 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 246, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: up
...to have the great participation reached up up to 44%, ranking the top among 5 countri...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, regarding, second, so, still

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.97073170732 353% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1229.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 234.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25213675214 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08120843555 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 106.607317073 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606837606838 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 361.8 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 86.8491537679 43.030603864 202% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 175.571428571 112.824112599 156% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.4285714286 22.9334400587 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 5.23603664747 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180331325655 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0882879832211 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131338732074 0.0843802449381 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137955427902 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.152427454866 0.0819641961636 186% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.0 13.2329268293 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.44 61.2550243902 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 40.7170731707 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.