Many people are afraid of leaving their houses because of the spread of crime. Some think that more actions can be taken to prevent crime from ouccuring, but others think little can be done. Discuss both view and give your opinion?
Recently, whether the opposed criminal activities are taken frequently to encounter the guilty or just little actions are propounded has been a topic of discussion. While reasons can be given to justify the latter, the former is much more preferable.
On the one hand, it is believed that nothing ensures the crimes are preventing cautiously. Firstly, the punishment submitting to impose on criminals is still slight. In addition, the legislators are too careless to resolve illegal actions when one approach cruel behaviour. For example, the embezzlement occurs regularly due to the loose regulations in some developing countries, which means almost lawyers receive money to help the criminals to escape from penalty. Secondly, the more raising population the more widening wealth gap, lead to the uncontrolled wrongdoing. To be more specific, the quantity of citizens is gradually growing and the distinguishes between the poor and the rich appear dramatically, so to a certain time, one who lives in the more worse circumstances will think about the law transgression to enhance their life. As a result, the rate society’s vices and brutal criminals are increasing rapidly because they know they will not have to be accepted anything from harsh regulations if they support illegality.
On the other hand, the counter argument raised by objectors to the mentioned view above is that lots of acts are proceeded to prevent the number of criminals from soaring up. Initially, the modern development enables citizens to resist the crimes all the time. In other words, executives are trying to create conditions for people to apply diverse applications to guarantee their safety throughout novel policies, state-of-the-are gadgets, severe rules, and so forth. For instance, the CCTV cameras are now installed at every street corner or resident areas to facilitate the all-time observation. Besides, the government can launch anti-crime public campaigns during enforcing new laws and providing education. Particularly, the amendment on offenders can bring out some positive effects because the access to literacy can help they to be away from a life of crime and stop them to come back with their sin. Consequently, due to the high consciousness of either citizens or reformed wrongdoers and the practical exercise of authorities, the safe and regulatory life present-day are more and more visible.
In conclusion, for the reasons mentioned, it is obvious to acknowledge the dominant drawbacks of this trend, but the active expression of anti-crime actions nowadays should not be overlooked.
- The graph gives information about the visits from France and North America for holiday and business in the past 73
- The graphs below show the changes in age structure of population in a European country from 1901 to 1941 1981 and a projection in 2021
- The diagram below shows what an office building looks at present and plans on future development 78
- The graph shows the size of ozone layer hole in Antarctic and the production of three kinds of ozone damaging gases from 1980 to 2000 73
- Some people argue that advertising is discouraging people from being different individuals and makes people to be or seem to be the same Do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 756, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'worse' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: worse
...to a certain time, one who lives in the more worse circumstances will think about the law ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, look, second, secondly, so, still, while, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2195.0 1615.20841683 136% => OK
No of words: 404.0 315.596192385 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43316831683 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01614268632 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 176.041082164 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626237623762 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 688.5 506.74238477 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 13.0 2.52805611222 514% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.9590599437 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.117647059 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7647058824 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6470588235 7.06120827912 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284509764898 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0717649374658 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519366193259 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151818722547 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0408050119539 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.98 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 78.4519038076 170% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.