The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graphics illustrate the average portions in normal meals of three types of nutrients, which are sodium, saturated fat and added sugar, all of which could be harmful if over-consumed.
Looking at the pies, it is immediately obvious that most of the added sugar comes from snack, while snack is the least contain sodium.
To start with, the dinner has largest quantity of sodium, reached 43%, following by lunch at 29%. Snack and breakfast contain the least sodium, both stood at 14%. Saturated fat has the similar trend to Sodium, at first place is dinner (37 out of 100), then is lunch, snack and breakfast respectively 26%, 21% and 16%.
Last but not least, the added sugar. It is totally different from the two other categories, with snack took the most added sugar, which is 42%. In the second place is dinner with 23%, next is lunch and breakfast, which are 19 out of 100 and 16 out of hundred.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 27, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'has the largest'.
Suggestion: has the largest
... sodium. To start with, the dinner has largest quantity of sodium, reached 43%, follow...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, second, so, then, while, to start with, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 756.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.725 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36639889917 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59375 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 201.6 283.868780488 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5890962008 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.125 5.23603664747 193% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0731995271258 0.215688989381 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0332033105572 0.103423049105 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0697489008714 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0614358567251 0.15604864568 39% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0898549168328 0.0819641961636 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.