The following pie charts compare about average percentages of Sodium, Saturated fat and Added sugar in typical meals consumed by the people of USA.
It is apparent that Sodium and Saturated fat is mostly taken as night meal whereas a large portion of Added sugar consumed in the form of snacks shown on chart. Sodium consumption peaked at Dinner time.
With regards of Sodium and Saturated fat, Americans consumed a figure of 43% Sodium where Saturated fat consumed slightly below than Sodium which is 37% only during taking their dinner meal. At lunch period, they received on average 27.5% of Sodium and fat while breakfast and snacks contained the less quantity of Sodium and fat. Although Breakfast and snacks received 14% of Sodium each time but percentage of Saturated fat (21%) is higher in snacks rather than morning meal (16%).
In case of sugar, Snacks item contained a vast portion of Added sugar which is 42% to be exact meanwhile breakfast experienced the lowest amount of sugar specifically 16%. Only 19% sugar consumed at lunch meal but the figure jump to 23% at dinner and 4% more than breakfast.
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features make comparisons where relevant 69
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 78
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso 75
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make 80
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 929.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91534391534 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3991310727 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550264550265 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5308798441 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.125 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.625 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.375 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0879176131737 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0464494815635 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0370604289793 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0685200607926 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0374169153037 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.