The following bar chart compares about frequency of eating fast food at restaurant by people of USA between 2003 and 2013. People are divided into six distinct groups based on their eating frequency.
It is apparent that a much larger portion of people went to restaurant once a week or once or twice a month whereas the lowest number people went daily to the restaurant. Eating junk food at restaurant once a week or once or twice a month peaked in 2003 and 2013.
According to the graph, most of the people visited restaurant once a week which is just over 30% in 2003 and 2006 where the percentage is slightly below in 2013. In 2003, 30% people went to restaurant once or twice a month and then a dramatic fall by 5% observed in 2006. On the contrary, around 33% people once or twice a month visited to the restaurant in 2013.
On the other hand, the least number of people entered restaurant daily to consume junk food which is below 5% during 2003 to 2013. In 2003, 5% people never went to restaurant and the number reduced by almost 2% in 2006 & 2013. By contrast, the figure for people went restaurant several times a week ranging from 15-20% in ten years period while around 15% people visited restaurant a few times in a year.
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso 75
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement making process and show how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes 84
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 78
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 73
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013 84
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
then, whereas, while, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1018.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.50442477876 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35007885326 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.451327433628 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3338025858 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.8 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342765398651 0.215688989381 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.173107321271 0.103423049105 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107031299366 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236452776391 0.15604864568 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0744627663136 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.12 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.96 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
then, whereas, while, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1018.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.50442477876 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35007885326 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.451327433628 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3338025858 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.8 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342765398651 0.215688989381 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.173107321271 0.103423049105 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107031299366 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236452776391 0.15604864568 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0744627663136 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.12 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.96 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.