The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much in 2022.
The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.
Overall, it is clear that while the levels of sodium and saturated fat in dinner are the highest among the four examined meals, the opposite is true for breakfast. Additionally, snack contains the highest proportion of added sugar.
According to the charts, dinner and lunch have the largest proportions of both sodium (43% for dinner and 29% for lunch) and saturated fat (37% for dinner and 26% for lunch). In contrast, the figures for added sugar in an average meal for dinner and lunch are much lower, with 23% and 19% respectively.
Regarding snack and breakfast, they are both made up of 14% sodium. As for saturated fat, the average percentage in snacks is 21%, slightly higher than that in breakfast, at 16%. In terms of added sugar, a considerable disparity can be seen in the figures for snack and breakfast, with 42% for the former and only 16% for the latter.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-25 | Phan phương linh | 78 | view |
- Some people think that exercise is the key to health while others feel that having a balanced diet is more important Discuss both views and give your opinion 95
- Nowadays more and more people decide to have children later in their life What are the reasons What are the effects on society and family life 89
- As well as making money businesses also have social responsibilities Do you agree or disagree 89
- nowadays people experience pressure and stress more than before what are the reasons for this what can be done to solve this problem 78
- it is recommended that education should be free for all Vietnamese children until they finish high school do you agree or disagree with this idea 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, regarding, so, while, as for, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 837.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72881355932 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54261141379 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581920903955 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9003627951 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.625 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197492264166 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128930507732 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.2754023914 0.0843802449381 326% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233708229669 0.15604864568 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.357730516871 0.0819641961636 436% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.