The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which maybe unhealthy if eaten too much. Summarise the main information by reporting and selecting the main feature, and make comparisons where relevant.
The three pie charts given illustrate the average nutrient consumption of sodium, saturated fat, and add sugars at different meal times within a day, and overusing may have a detrimental effect on our health.
Overall, both sodium and saturated fat takes up the largest amount in dinner, whereas extra sugar is mostly consumed in snack meal.
Regarding the pictures, the highest proportion of salt substance is used during dinner, taking up 43%, followed by 29% at lunch. Its quantitive in breakfast and snacks share the same percentage, with 14% each.
Similar to sodium, the distribution of saturated fat in typical meals is in the same order, with 37% of fatty food used in dinner, the next is lunch, snack, and breakfast with the proportion is 26%, 21%, and 16% respectively. In contrast, extra sweet substance witnessed the highest amount in snacks, 42%, nearly double in the amount which used in dinner, 23%, and slightly less used in lunch and morning meal with 19% and 16% respectively.
- the graph below shows the average number of UK commuters traveling each day by bus, car or train between 1970 and 2030 73
- It is inevitale that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible To what extend do you agree or disagree with this view 89
- The plan below shows the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year Summarise the information by reporting and selecting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The plans below show the public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarise the information by reporting and selecting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by reporting and selecting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, regarding, so, whereas, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 834.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02409638554 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63880177086 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620481927711 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.1561528258 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.0 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6666666667 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 5.23603664747 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0666824864633 0.215688989381 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0323568609628 0.103423049105 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0334427643039 0.0843802449381 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0417657741111 0.15604864568 27% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368595245011 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.