The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which maybe unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which maybe unhealthy if eaten too much.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The given diagrams illustrate the average proportion of 3 main nutrients in 4 meals, all those substances may harm users' herhealth if they misuse them. A quick overview of the chart reveals that people tend to use sodium in the dinners while for snacks they add sugar the most.
Looking at details, the proportion of saturated fat and added sugar Americans use is the same, with the figure for each nutrient is 16%. Meanwhile, sodium accounted for the lowest percentage in the breakfasts among 3 nutrients at 14%. In lunches, citizens consume sodium the most, which the figure makes up 29% and followed by saturated fats and added sugar at 26% and 19% respectively.
In contrast, the figure of sodium in the dinners accounted for 43%, which is the highest. The proportion of added sugar is 23% lower than the figure for saturated fats, at 37%. Likewise, Americans use sugar the most in snack meals at 42% and the figure for sodium is the lowest proportion at 14% throughout the time surveyed.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-02-28 lilyngan 11 view
2022-02-28 lilyngan 11 view
2022-02-28 lilyngan 11 view
2021-02-23 Trinh Phuong 61 view
Essays by user Trinh Phuong :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 327, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on at 14% throughout the time surveyed.
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, look, may, so, while, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 825.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79651162791 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56000856669 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552325581395 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.3791465935 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.125 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0749667220043 0.215688989381 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.039404226339 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0290365049663 0.0843802449381 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0585881015422 0.15604864568 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0259685612366 0.0819641961636 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.