The given pie charts give information on the average proportion of the nutritional value of three types of nutrients (sodium, saturated fats and added sugars) in common meals consumed in the USA. Excess consumption of these nutrients can be detrimental to one's health.
Overall, it is clear that sodium and saturated fats are high in the average American dinner while their snacks are full of added sugar. On the other hand, the snacks have the lowest sodium content and it is noteworthy that a typical breakfast in the USA is low in all these nutrients.
The first chart clearly shows that sodium makes up almost half of the total nutrients in dinner meals at 42%, while lunch contains 29% and14% in both breakfast and lunch. Similarly, in the second chart, most dinner diet is high in saturated fats at 37% and almost a quarter of fat consumed is found in lunch and about a third of saturated fats are consumed in breakfast and snacks collectively.
Lastly, snacks are highly concertrated with added sugar constituting almost half of the total proportion of sugar and almost a third is found in breakfast and lunch combined, while 23%is found in dinner meals.
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which be unhealthy if eaten too much. 67
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of students who passed their high school competency exams, by subject and gender, during the period 2010-2011.*includes French, German and Spanish 78
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010. 67
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words. 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 255, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...f these nutrients can be detrimental to ones health. Overall, it is clear that so...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, lastly, second, similarly, so, third, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 970.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8743718593 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55209107584 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507537688442 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.7245497942 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.571428571 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4285714286 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.85714285714 5.23603664747 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100007671244 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0543910803883 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462991992115 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0657757024629 0.15604864568 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0475113474302 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.