The charts illustrate the intake of various possible harmful nutrients (added sugar, sodium and saturated fat) during daily meals such as snacks, breakfast, dinner and lunch.
Overall, the diet of the USA citizens consists of particularly healthy breakfast. However, they tend to intake the biggest amount of sodium and saturated fat food during the dinner time, whilst sugar-rich products intake is higher throughout the day as a form of snacks.
Firstly, the patterns, regarding sodium and saturated fat use, are both similar. It is noticed that there is a trend on choosing sodium and saturated fat food for dinner more often (43% and 37%, respectively). While snacks and breakfast are the least saturated with these nutrients with the similar average percentage.
Meanwhile, nearly half the average percentage of added sugar was found in daily snacks that the USA respondents eat (42%).
It was almost two times the amount consumed during breakfast, lunch and dinner.
- It is better to save money than to spend it.How far do you agree with this statement?Is saving more important than spending in today’s world?Give reasons for your answer, and provide ideas and examples from your ownYou should spend about 40 minutes on t 61
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features make comparisons where relevant. 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 33, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cks. Firstly, the patterns, regarding sodium and saturated fat use, are both s...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, regarding, so, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 33.7804878049 47% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 822.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33766233766 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58695952586 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.623376623377 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.0958357757 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.75 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0333353477422 0.215688989381 15% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0153729884209 0.103423049105 15% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0209272842348 0.0843802449381 25% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0221156734687 0.15604864568 14% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.02214028027 0.0819641961636 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.