The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions in Edinburgh

Essay topics:

The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions in Edinburgh

The line graph illustrates the rate of Scotland's visitors that called on four different destinations over the period 30 years.
Overall, the number of tourists in Scotland who visited to the castle fluctuated significantly and kept almost the highest percentage between 1980 and 2010. In contrast, there was a gradual variation but in a low percentage in the rate of Scotland's visitors went to the zoo over the period shown.
The percentage of visitors in Scotland paying a visit to the castle stood at the a low rate to about 22%, but the figure for that climbed enormously until reach a peak of 45% in 1995, then it turned to decline minimally during the next 15 years, whereas the rate of Scotland’s visitors going to the zoo started at the lowest point and varied steadily in the first 20 years and there was a considerable growth in the last 10 years
Regarding to the two other tourist attractions: festival and aquarium. There was a gradual fall in the proportion of tourists in Scotland coming to the festival by around 12%. Although the rate of Scotlanders to the aquarium increased dramatically in first 5 years, The period from 1985 to 1990 witnessed a drop and continued to fall until the end of the period.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-09-02 Giang Tran 56 view
2022-09-21 shahzodaahmadjonova view
Essays by user Giang Tran :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 78, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'a' is left.
Suggestion: the; a
...d paying a visit to the castle stood at the a low rate to about 22%, but the figure f...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 295, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...st 5 years, The period from 1985 to 1990 witnessed a drop and continued to fall u...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, regarding, then, whereas, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1014.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76056338028 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74815967188 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535211267606 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 22.4926829268 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 136.802473175 43.030603864 318% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 169.0 112.824112599 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.5 22.9334400587 155% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.83333333333 5.23603664747 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228997423537 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124545611562 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0716756127892 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150257494632 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.067418297827 0.0819641961636 82% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.2329268293 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.87 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.92 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.9970731707 145% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 78, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'a' is left.
Suggestion: the; a
...d paying a visit to the castle stood at the a low rate to about 22%, but the figure f...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 295, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...st 5 years, The period from 1985 to 1990 witnessed a drop and continued to fall u...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, regarding, then, whereas, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1014.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76056338028 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74815967188 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535211267606 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 22.4926829268 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 136.802473175 43.030603864 318% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 169.0 112.824112599 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.5 22.9334400587 155% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.83333333333 5.23603664747 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228997423537 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124545611562 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0716756127892 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150257494632 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.067418297827 0.0819641961636 82% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.2329268293 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.87 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.92 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.9970731707 145% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.