The pie chart below shows the comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in two years
The graph represents the comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005.
The initial impression from the graph is that gas and coal were always the main energy production and also witnessed upward trends over the period shown. While, the proportion of petrol fell dramatically at the same time. Although the figures for nuclear and other energy make up a small amount, the percentage of them rose significantly in 10 years.
Starting at 29.80% in 1995, coal was the highest in the comparison with the remaining four. Following that was gas with 29.63% and the data of petrol was about 29.27%. After 10 years of growth, the proportion of coal witnessed a slight surge to 30.93% in 2005. Likewise, the proportion of gas also saw a moderate rise to 30.31%. And the opposite trend is for the proportion of petrol, it experienced a steep decline to 19.55% in the last year of the period shown.
With a reference to the proportion of nuclear, it was begin at 6.40% and also higher than
the figure of other energy was underneath at 4.90% in 1995. 10 years later, the proportion of nuclear and other energy roared sharply to respectively 10.10% and 9.10%.
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent d 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of the population in the UK who consumed the recommended daily amount of fruit and vegetables in 2002 2006 and 2010 67
- The charts show the main methods of transport of people travelling to one university in 2004 and 2009 Summarise the information be selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagram shows the plan of medical center in 2008 and 2010 48
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...production in France in 1995 and 2005. The initial impression from the graph is...
^^^
Line 2, column 157, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ed upward trends over the period shown. While, the proportion of petrol fell dramatic...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f them rose significantly in 10 years. Starting at 29.80% in 1995, coal was the...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in the last year of the period shown. With a reference to the proportion of nu...
^^^
Line 4, column 58, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'begun'.
Suggestion: begun
...ce to the proportion of nuclear, it was begin at 6.40% and also higher than the fig...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 93, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... was begin at 6.40% and also higher than the figure of other energy was underneat...
^^^
Line 5, column 94, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 1995. 10 years later, the proportion of nuclear and other energy roared sharply ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, likewise, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 982.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79024390244 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60140446211 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517073170732 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.0577955675 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.2727272727 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6363636364 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.63636363636 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146427850981 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0650063158679 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102635733957 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115793488655 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.135316226531 0.0819641961636 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.