The two line charts manifest the alteration in the right of possession of electrical apparatuses and number of time taken to do household chores in one nation over a period of 99 years.
The first graph gives information in relation to percentage electrical devices in each household. In 1920, the percentage utilization of refrigerator was 0%, which surged to over 50% and 90% in 1940 and 1960 respectively. In the year of 1980, it had a steadily increase by 10% and leveled off 100% throughout the next years. The percentage using vacuum cleaner and washing mechine had a minuscule difference ( 30% and 40% for each), which augmented by 10% in 1940 and rose to the similar level (at 70%) after 20 years. Following that years, they had contrasting trends. The utilization of vacuum cleaner grew to 90% and 100% in 1980 and 2000 respestively and unchanging in next years, while the using of washing mechanic slightly fell in1980 ( under 70%) and steadily increased in following years ( roughly 70% between 2000 and 2019).
The second chart provides data about amount of time to do housework weely.In 1920, it was a half, which decrease graually in 1940 and 1960 (over 30% amd 20% respectively). It flatten out over 10% from 1980 to 2000 and had a slight decline to one in ten in 2019.
Overall, the percentage of electrical gadgets in households were increasing whereas amout of time weeky to do housework was falling.
- Parents often give children everything they ask for and do what they like Is it good for children What are the consequences when they grow up 61
- In some countries students pay their college or university fees while in some others the government pay for them Do you think the advantages that government pays the money outweigh the disadvantages 67
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014 87
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 67
- The diagram below shows the production and processing of milk and dairy products for commercial sale Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 250, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('steadily') instead an adjective, or a noun ('increase') instead of another adjective.
...spectively. In the year of 1980, it had a steadily increase by 10% and leveled off 100% throughout ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 407, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...shing mechine had a minuscule difference 30% and 40% for each, which augmented by...
^^
Line 2, column 737, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of washing mechanic slightly fell in1980 under 70% and steadily increased in foll...
^^
Line 2, column 790, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd steadily increased in following years roughly 70% between 2000 and 2019. The ...
^^
Line 3, column 74, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...ut amount of time to do housework weely.In 1920, it was a half, which decrease gra...
^^
Line 3, column 173, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'flattens'?
Suggestion: flattens
... 1960 over 30% amd 20% respectively. It flatten out over 10% from 1980 to 2000 and had ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1169.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 242.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8305785124 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75971500535 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537190082645 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 333.9 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.3201508914 43.030603864 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.9 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.3 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159440660552 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0661461918845 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597616775404 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122990280874 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0422329949702 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 250, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('steadily') instead an adjective, or a noun ('increase') instead of another adjective.
...spectively. In the year of 1980, it had a steadily increase by 10% and leveled off 100% throughout ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 407, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...shing mechine had a minuscule difference 30% and 40% for each, which augmented by...
^^
Line 2, column 737, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of washing mechanic slightly fell in1980 under 70% and steadily increased in foll...
^^
Line 2, column 790, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd steadily increased in following years roughly 70% between 2000 and 2019. The ...
^^
Line 3, column 74, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...ut amount of time to do housework weely.In 1920, it was a half, which decrease gra...
^^
Line 3, column 173, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'flattens'?
Suggestion: flattens
... 1960 over 30% amd 20% respectively. It flatten out over 10% from 1980 to 2000 and had ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1169.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 242.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8305785124 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75971500535 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537190082645 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 333.9 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.3201508914 43.030603864 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.9 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.3 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159440660552 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0661461918845 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597616775404 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122990280874 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0422329949702 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.