The two line charts manifest the alteration in the right of possession of electrical apparatuses and number of time taken to do household chores in one nation over a period of 99 years.
In 1920, the percentage utilization of refrigerator was 0%, which surged to over 50% and 90% in 1940 and 1960 respectively. In the year of 1980, it had a steady increase by 10% and leveled off 100% throughout the next years. The percentage using vacuum cleaner and washing mechine had a minuscule difference ( 30% and 40% for each), which augmented by 10% in 1940 and rose to the similar level (at 70%) after 20 years. Following that years, they had contrasting trends. The utilization of vacuum cleaner grew to 90% and 100% in 1980 and 2000 respestively and unchanging in next years, while the using of washing mechanic slightly fell in1980 ( under 70%) and increased again in following years ( roughly 70% between 2000 and 2019).
In 1920, it was a half, which decreased gradually in 1940 and 1960 (over 30% amd 20% respectively). It flattened out over 10% from 1980 to 2000 and had a slight decline to one in ten in 2019.
Overall, the percentage of electrical gadgets in households were increasing whereas amout of time weeky to do housework was falling.
- The line graph below gives information about the number of visitors to three London museums between June and September 2013 87
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research this 84
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 73
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree to this statement 61
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 307, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...shing mechine had a minuscule difference 30% and 40% for each, which augmented by...
^^
Line 2, column 637, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of washing mechanic slightly fell in1980 under 70% and increased again in followi...
^^
Line 2, column 687, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...% and increased again in following years roughly 70% between 2000 and 2019. In 1...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1022.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73148148148 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74353898694 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537037037037 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.8832196863 43.030603864 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.555555556 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112734000644 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0496385343927 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0557927431242 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0953712518271 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0541912777962 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.