The charts illustrate the figure for ordinary with washing machine, refrigerator, vacuum cleaner and how much time per week every family extended on household chores during almost a century, starting from 1920.
Overall, the proportion of household owning electrical appliances witnessed an upward trend, with that of refrigerator having the greatest popularity whereas the opposite was true for the duration people spending on housekeeping weekly.
It can be obvious in the first line chart that washing machine was the most popular, about 40% in 1920 in comparison with refrigerator which almost no one utilized at the same time. However, the refrigerator used to get widely recognition by significantly increasing to 100% throughout the period of 60 years, particularly 1980 and became the earliest growth among washing machine and vacuum cleaner with 65% and 90% respectively. Likewise, vacuum cleaner witnessed steady increase and reached the same percentage with its previous one in 2000, they both remained unchanged until the year 2019.
By contrast, there was five fold decrease from 50% to 10% the amount of time people doing drudgery during ten decades.
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons wh
- Some people think women should be given the same opportunity to work and excel just like men Others believe that a woman s responsibility should be limited to looking after children and housework What is your opinion Use relevant details and examples to s 56
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of the electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compari 67
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of the electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compari 78
- As well as making money businesses also have social responsibilities Do you agree or disagree 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, likewise, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 993.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4861878453 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79511056699 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.701657458564 0.547539520022 128% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.4059555565 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 165.5 112.824112599 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.1666666667 22.9334400587 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121736904131 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0596127112253 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0301060479634 0.0843802449381 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0729866612066 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00862617429712 0.0819641961636 11% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.5 13.2329268293 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 61.2550243902 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.3012195122 157% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 11.4140731707 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.4329268293 175% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 11.0658536585 181% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.