The charts below show the changes in ownership of the electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compari

The charts provide information about the proportion of households using 3 different electrical devices and how many hours per week they spent doing housework in one country in the period between 1920 and 2019.
Overall, what stands out from the first chart is that the rate of families using washing machine, refrigerator and vacuum cleaner experienced an upward trend. Another noteworthy observation is that the number of hours in doing housework in each household underwent a downward trend in this period.
In term of washing machine, the percentage of household using this device began at 40%, which was followed by a strong increase in the next 4 decades. After witnessing the slight decrease, this proportion peaked at over 70% in 2019. Meanwhile, although the share of family using refrigerator stayed at under 10%, it rocketed in the next 6 decades, reaching peak of 100% in 1980 and remaining stable until 2019. Finally, 30% of households used vacuum cleaner in the first year, but this number grew up moderately (20% per 2 decades) until peaked at 100% in 2 last decades.
In 1920, each household took 50 hours per week to do housework before this number plunged by 15 hours per 2 decades until 1960. Following this, the number of hours spent doing housework continue to decline albeit less pronounced in the remaining periods and hit the low at 10 hours per week in 2019.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 300, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t the low at 10 hours per week in 2019.
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1152.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 234.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92307692308 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59940090987 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57264957265 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 326.7 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6202466923 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.0 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161117907254 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0772360686037 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0873880921304 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131414612951 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106081557691 0.0819641961636 129% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.