The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time doing housework and households in one country between 1920 and 2019.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The charts illustrate the changes of electronic devices being processed by people and how many times people did housework in one country during 1920 to 2019.
Overall, the percentage of refrigerator witnessed the most significant change in all years while that of washing machine remained stable. The three devices all increased in the number of households with electrical appliances.
In 1920, refrigerator, vacuum cleaner and washing machine began at different numbers, 0, 30 and 40 respectively. Then the refrigerator had shown dramatically and rapidly grew in 1940, the others jumped considerably by 20 percent. Moreover, during the 1960 and 2000, while the refrigerator and vacuum cleaner displayed an upward trend, washing machine decreased slightly then rose up after that. Furthermore, all three devices remained stable from 2000 to 2019 and washing machine hit the highest point at about 70% while those of the others at 100%.
Despite the number of households with the appearance of electrical appliances, number of times spending with the housework had a downward trend from 1920 to 2019. Before this data dropped below 30 hours in 1960, the times of people doing housework was 50 hours. In the last years, this number fell and hit the lowest point at 10 hours in 2019.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-21 | nobitaa | 89 | view |
| 2024-08-21 | nobitaa | 89 | view |
| 2023-11-29 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-01 | huyen_duong | 67 | view |
| 2023-05-01 | huyen_duong | 73 | view |
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 396, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...eased slightly then rose up after that. Furthermore A\all three devices remained stable fro...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1086.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24637681159 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73321533276 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574879227053 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.464569585 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.6 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161373146473 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0645752603038 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663570102022 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113211230882 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0750426606919 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 396, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...eased slightly then rose up after that. Furthermore A\all three devices remained stable fro...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1086.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24637681159 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73321533276 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574879227053 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.464569585 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.6 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161373146473 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0645752603038 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663570102022 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113211230882 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0750426606919 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.