The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time doing housework and households in one country between 1920 and 2019.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Looking at the chart on changes in ownership of electrical equipment, we can see that the percentage of households owning a refrigerator, washing machine, dishwasher, and microwave has increased significantly over time. In 1920, less than 5% of households owned a refrigerator, but by 2019, this had increased to over 90%. Similarly, ownership of washing machines has increased from less than 20% in 1920 to over 80% in 2019. The ownership of dishwashers and microwaves has also increased from negligible levels in 1920 to around 60% and 80%, respectively, in 2019.
Moving on to the chart on the number of hours taken doing housework in families, we can see that there has been a gradual decrease in the amount of time spent on housework over time. In 1920, the average family spent close to 60 hours a week on housework, but by 2019, this had reduced to around 20 hours a week. This decrease in housework time can be attributed to the increased ownership of electrical equipment, which has made housework easier and more efficient.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-21 | nobitaa | 89 | view |
| 2024-08-21 | nobitaa | 89 | view |
| 2023-11-29 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-01 | huyen_duong | 67 | view |
| 2023-05-01 | huyen_duong | 73 | view |
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time doing housework and households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons wher 67
- In their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasise that their products are new in some way Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development 78
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time doing housework and households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons wher 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, similarly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 862.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92571428571 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96392459074 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502857142857 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4275362183 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.142857143 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223920588107 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11237219094 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0337764265359 0.0843802449381 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175751826636 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0121610485451 0.0819641961636 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.