The line charts illustrate total proportion of electric appliances in a given country throughout one century since 1920 and the result on housework undertaken per week.
Overview, it is readily apparent that all mentioned electrical appliances became more popular, in particular fridges, vacuum cleaners, and washing machines. The total time spent doing housework has also declined steadily and dramatically in the last one hundred years.
In the upper chart, refrigerators witnessed the most significant rise, beginning at just over 0% in 1920, surging to more than 50% in 1950, and then continuing to rise steadily until plateauing at 100% around 1980. Vacuum cleaners started higher at 30% and then rose by precisely 20% every twenty years until 1960 when growth tapered and ownership ultimately reach 100% by 1980. In contrast, the percentage of washing machines began at 40% climbed to 70% by 1960, then fell slighted l, and recovered to finish the whole period at just above 70%.
On the other hand, the result for housework was that time spent washing clothes, preparing meals, and cleaning fell steadily from 50 hours a week ín 1920 to 20 by 1960. After that, the decline was more gradual, reaching sightly above 10 hours by 2019.
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: kimkimkim
Essay Categories
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 253, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eaching sightly above 10 hours by 2019.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, then, in contrast, in particular, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1042.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13300492611 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59330482695 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.679802955665 0.547539520022 124% => OK
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.553087423 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.25 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.375 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 5.23603664747 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160357844921 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0727882846983 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644645032622 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113457149543 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0605740386041 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.