The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time doing housework and households in one country between 1920 and 2019.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line charts illustrate the quantity of households that were equipped with electrical appliances and how much time people spent doing housework in a week from 1920 to 2019.
Generally, the percentage of refrigerator and vacuum cleaner increased rapidly in the first few years while the number of hours people had for doing housework decreased through years. Units were measured in hours in the second line graph.
In terms of refrigerator, there was an increase of 55% in households with electrical appliances in the first 20 years from 1920 at 0% to 1940 with 55%. After that, this figure grew by 35% to 90% in 1960. From 1980 to 2019, refrigerator area took the highest position steadily at 100%. Between 1920 and 1940, washing machine and vacuum cleaner increased by 20%, from 40% to 60% and from 30% to 50% respectively. In the period of 60 years from 1940 to 2000, the quantity of washing machine fluctuated between 60% and 70% and grew by 5% the last 19 years. Meanwhile, the vacuum cleaner area increased by 20% every 20 years from 1920, taking up 90% in 1980. In 2000, the percentage of vacuum cleaner touched 100%.
On the other hand, people spent less time doing housework through years. The data declined by 30 hours from 50 hours to 20 hours a week between 1920 and 1960. 20 years later, the statistic dropped by 5 hours then it remained stable at 15 hours during the period between 1980 and 2000. In the last 19 years, the number of hours had a small drop, at 11 hours on a weekly basis.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-29 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-01 | huyen_duong | 67 | view |
| 2023-05-01 | huyen_duong | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-15 | queanh | 73 | view |
| 2022-10-05 | Dang Trung Hieu | 25 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, second, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 33.7804878049 181% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1244.0 965.302439024 129% => OK
No of words: 269.0 196.424390244 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.62453531599 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43848603048 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483271375465 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 321.3 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.7253330196 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.8571428571 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2142857143 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.21428571429 5.23603664747 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123820971152 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0486142743344 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0618892055748 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102255670367 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0810274428825 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 86.03 61.2550243902 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.69 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.