The given pie charts compare the amount of energy manufactured from six different sources in a particular nation between 1985 and 2003. Overall, it could be easily observed that the percentage of oil occupied a significant share of the chart, while there was just a mere minority of other renewables and hydrogen.
In 1985, it is explicit that the amount of oil, nuclear energy, and natural gas overtook other sections by a wide margin. The highest proportion was seen in the category of oil, with 52%, amounting to over a half of the pie chart. Following that, there was a notable notable percentage of nuclear and natural, at 22% and 13%, respectively.Meanwhile, the remaining categories accounted for a tiny fraction, which was lower than 10%.
By 2003, oil and nuclear were two sources of energy that experienced a shortfall, however, oil still held the top spot. In contrast, there was an increase in other sections. The percentage of energy produced from natural gas rose by 10%, standing at the second largest portion of the chart. Other renewables and hydrogen have comparable figures of 4%, which is higher than the 3% in 1985. In addition, coal constituted 13% as against 8% in 1985.
- The charts below show changes in the proportion of the energy produced from different resources in a country in 1985 and 2003 78
- The charts below show changes in the proportion of the energy produced from different resources in a country in 1985 and 2003 73
- The charts below show changes in the proportion of the energy produced from different resources in a country in 1985 and 2003 78
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in the year 1999 78
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel s customer service The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 259, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: notable
... pie chart. Following that, there was a notable notable percentage of nuclear and natural, at 2...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 339, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Meanwhile
...d natural, at 22% and 13%, respectively.Meanwhile, the remaining categories accounted for...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, so, still, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 996.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93069306931 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92650892109 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59900990099 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7236777959 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194585469492 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0779872437857 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0785297932158 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142403123494 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0618734038768 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.