The given pie charts compare the amount of energy manufactured from six different sources in a particular nation between 1985 and 2003. Overall, it could be easily observed that the percentage of oil occupied a significant share of the chart, while there was just a mere minority of other renewables and hydrogen.
In 1985, it is explicit that the amount of oil, nuclear energy, and natural gas overtook other sections by a wide margin. The highest proportion was seen in the category of oil, with 52%, amounting to over a half of the pie chart. Following that, there was a notable notable percentage of nuclear and natural, at 22% and 13%, respectively.Meanwhile, the remaining categories accounted for a tiny fraction, which was lower than 10%.
By 2003, oil and nuclear were two sources of energy that experienced a shortfall, however, oil still held the top spot. In contrast, there was an increase in other sections. The percentage of energy produced from natural gas rose by 10%, standing at the second largest portion of the chart. Other renewables and hydrogen have comparable figures of 4%, which is higher than the 3% in 1985. In addition, coal constituted 13% as against 8% in 1985.
- The charts below show changes in the proportion of the energy produced from different resources in a country in 1985 and 2003 73
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel s customer service The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010 84
- The charts below show changes in the proportion of the energy produced from different resources in a country in 1985 and 2003 78
- In many countries mainly tourists but not local people visit museums and historical sites Why does this happen and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places 84
- The line graph and the bar chart give the information and forecast about the vehicle numbers and CO2 emission in England and Wales between 2000 and 2020 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where rele 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 259, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: notable
... pie chart. Following that, there was a notable notable percentage of nuclear and natural, at 2...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 339, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Meanwhile
...d natural, at 22% and 13%, respectively.Meanwhile, the remaining categories accounted for...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, so, still, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 996.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93069306931 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92650892109 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59900990099 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7236777959 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194585469492 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0779872437857 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0785297932158 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142403123494 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0618734038768 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.