The pie charts illustrate how the production of energy, from various sources, changed in a specific country form 1985 to 2003.
Overall, the use of some sources increased for energy production, while other's decreased. Oil was the dominant source to be used for production over the period despite experiencing a slight decrease. However, the contribution of coal and natural gas, for the purpose, rose dramatically.
In 1985, just over half of the electricity was generated from oil. Although its proportion dropped significantly to 39% in 2003, it remained the major source of electricity production. Similarly, nuclear power was the second most used source, providing 22% of energy initially. However, in 2003 its share decreased substantially to 8 percent only. In contrast, coal and natural gas were producing 8% and 13% energy respectively in 1985. Whereas, their use rose markedly to almost a quarter in 2003. Moreover, other renewable resources contributed only 1% in 1985 and 4% in 2003. Finally, hydropower provided just 4% of electricity in both the years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 438, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...8% and 13% energy respectively in 1985. Whereas, their use rose markedly to almost a qu...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, moreover, second, similarly, so, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 901.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33136094675 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02768986534 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.656804733728 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.8424348864 43.030603864 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 75.0833333333 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.0833333333 22.9334400587 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253811295449 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0822511351274 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0801001645568 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17270177189 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109214844631 0.0819641961636 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.3012195122 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.04 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.