The charts below show degree granted in different fields at the National University in the years 1990 2000 and 2010

A comparison of four different study disciplines at the National University during thirty years is provided, visualised as pie charts. On display are graduation percentages in Computer Science, Medicine, Business and Law in 1990, 2000 and 2010.

General trends are discernible, revealing an upward tendency of granted degrees in Computer Science, whilst students graduating with a Business degree slumped significantly in comparison. Medicine and Law on the other hand have been undergoing minor fluctuations, however remained relatively stable during the course of three decennia.

In detail, Computer Science commenced with a contigent of 30 per cent in 1990 and steadily increased its graduates to 40% and 45% in 2000 and 2010, repsectively. At the same time conferred degrees in Business started equally strong with 30% in 1990, but then decreased by the same per cent figures as Computer Science increased, that is 20% of students graduated in 2000 and 15% in 2010 with a business degree.

Degrees granted in Law and Medicine changed each by 5 per cent points in 2000 but by 2010, they both returned to the same figures of 1990 with, respectively, 25% and 15% for Medicine and Law.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 300, Rule ID: DURING_THE_COURSE_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'during'.
Suggestion: during
...ons, however remained relatively stable during the course of three decennia. In detail, Computer...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 320, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d relatively stable during the course of three decennia. In detail, Computer S...
^^
Line 7, column 158, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...same figures of 1990 with, respectively, 25% and 15% for Medicine and Law.
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, then, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1006.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23958333333 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90891827928 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598958333333 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.1251778898 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.714285714 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4285714286 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251038107988 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117680534379 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0593786951152 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157924722934 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0727413690716 0.0819641961636 89% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.