The charts below show the growth in the population in some of the world’s largest cities as well as the population distribution in urban and rural areas.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar graph illustrates, the number of people lived in five biggest cities like Tokyo, New york, Shangai, Bombay, and jakartha in three different years. While, table demonstrates, the highest populated cities globally in 1950 and 2010. Units measured in millions. However, line graph depicts, the proportion of people lived in urban and rural area over 30 years in billions.
Overall, all the given countries population increased over the 40 years period, especially after 1990. The biggest populated city was Tokyo with considerably, 30 million , whereas, Bombay accumulate significant amount of people recently. Similarly, most of the people interested to live in urban areas than rural when years pass on.
Initially, population in Jakartha and Bombay increases more than other given countries significantly, such as, in 1950 only five or less than five million people who lived in these cities, whereas, when 2010 it surged to approximately, 18 million and 27 million respectively. Similarly, Newyork, shangai consists of more than 10 million people in 1970 and 1990 and population increased over five million by 2010.
Secondly, as is observed in table the most populated city was New york in 1950 with 12.5 million whereas, in 2010 Tokyo replaced the highest position from 6.5 in 1950 to 27.6 in 2010. The least populated cities was Paris and Moscow in 1950 with mere 5.3 million, whilst, in 2010 all the given countries has more than 20 million population figured and instead jakartha comprise of 20.8 million people. Moreover, in 1980, population of rural area began at 3 billion which stay steadily over next 10 years later hiked up to 3.5 billion in 2000 and declined to the beginning count in 2010. Mean while in urban area near 2 billion population has pictured which dramatically increased following years and climbed up to more than 4 billion by 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-24 | Vansh Srivastava | 78 | view |
- 49 The chart below shows the spending in million by 18 20 year olds in one country on five different products in 2010 and 2014 72
- The graph below shows a survey result of 4000 participants who expressed what important aspects they have learned from the internship they have completed Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where rel 83
- The pie chart below shows the percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney Australia in 1997 and 2007
- The charts below shows the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 78
- it is inevitable that as technology advances traditional cultures will be lost it seem that we cannot have these things together to what extend do you agree or disagree this statement 48
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 54, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... illustrates, the number of people lived in five biggest cities like Tokyo, New y...
^^
Line 3, column 170, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... was Tokyo with considerably, 30 million , whereas, Bombay accumulate significant ...
^^
Line 7, column 359, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...0 million population figured and instead jakartha comprise of 20.8 million people...
^^
Line 7, column 370, Rule ID: COMPRISE_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprise' or 'consist of'?
Suggestion: comprise; consist of
...opulation figured and instead jakartha comprise of 20.8 million people. Moreover, in 1980,...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 588, Rule ID: MEAN_WHILE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'meanwhile'?
Suggestion: Meanwhile
...eclined to the beginning count in 2010. Mean while in urban area near 2 billion population...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, second, secondly, similarly, whereas, while, as to, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1571.0 965.302439024 163% => OK
No of words: 305.0 196.424390244 155% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15081967213 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 3.73543355544 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67171803064 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 106.607317073 148% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518032786885 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 452.7 283.868780488 159% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.3596440436 43.030603864 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.846153846 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4615384615 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.30769230769 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122299173452 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0564768850777 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0269035984285 0.0843802449381 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0883391435863 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.028161649006 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 40.7170731707 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.