The charts below show how average middle-income families spent their household budget in two different years.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The charts below show how average middle-income families spent their household budget in two different years.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The provided pie charts demonstrate information about family spent budget for Housing, Food/Clothes, Vacations/Leisure and Others from 2012 to 2015.
Overall, it can be clearly seen that most families spent their more than half of money for Housing. However, they spent the least amount of their budget for Other purposes.

Firstly, in both years people mostly used their cash for Housing, which had the significant percentage among the others, moreover, after 3 years the percentage of money spent increased from 35% to 50%. Although, Miscellaneous had the least allotment of spent middle-income families’ budget, and it decreased by 10% in the given years.

Secondly, in 2012, using of Vacations, Leisure and Food, Clothes together had the same consumption in quota (50%) as Housing in 2015. In addition, in the end of the period, consumed for Other purposes and Food, Clothes together had 15% it was similar rate as Misc. in 2012. Additionally, while money spent for Housing had 35% in the beginning of the period, the same proportion of spent cash was in Food and Clothes.

As can be seen, the citizens used more of their household budget for Housing, nevertheless, they did not make attention for Misc.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-05-03 Azizat Gilmeyeva 84 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic
Essays by user Azizat Gilmeyeva :
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 184, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., in the end of the period, consumed for Other purposes and Food, Clothes togethe...
^^
Line 6, column 265, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...er had 15% it was similar rate as Misc. in 2012. Additionally, while money spent f...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, while, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1025.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17676767677 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8790226734 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565656565657 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7130372693 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.888888889 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.88888888889 5.23603664747 189% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153785260123 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0697446798856 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0599283473666 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101860382706 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0409894805754 0.0819641961636 50% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.